Legal Opinion

Hallman v. Dothan Foundry & MacHine Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1919No. 4 Div. 592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County'; H. A. Pearce, Judge. Action in detinue by the Dothan Foundry & Machine Company against L. B. Hallman, for the recovery of personal property in specie. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiff relied for recovery upon a mortgage properly executed by one J. W. Wilson and duly recorded on September 6, 1917. This mortgage described one Ford motor and frame with “a Smith-Form-a-Truck attachment attached, the attachment this day delivered to him.’'’ About the 1st of September, Wilson, the mortgagor, purchased of the plaintiff a Smith" Form-a-Truck attachment, complete, to be attached to a Ford chassis which he brought to the plaintiff’s place of business. Wilson did not pay for the Form-a-Truck attachment, but executed the mortgage, hereinabove referred to, to secure the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  2. Alley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. K. C. Tire Co. v. Way Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Tire Shop v. PeatSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Johnson v. Interstate Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API