Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Carter

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1967No. 10777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*289SORENSEN, District Judge:

Action to quiet title. The case was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts.

Pender, Eliason and defendants acquired title in 1949 from Salt Lake County by auditor’s tax deed. The stipulation recites that in 1951 Pender, by quitclaim deed, conveyed “his interest” to plaintiffs and also in 1951 Eliason, by quitclaim deed, conveyed “her interest” to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs then went into possession, fenced and farmed the premises, paid taxes thereon, and in 1965 brought this action to quiet title as against the record title holder and defendants, on the theory of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Board of Land Com'rs v. RirieUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Heiselt v. HeiseltUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McGarry v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sperry v. TolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Morrison v. HawksettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mel Trimble Real Estate v. Monte Vista Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. Riter v. CayiasUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. LozanoUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gillmor v. GillmorUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Massey v. ProtheroUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API