Legal Opinion
St. Paul Foundry Co. v. Burnstad School District No. 31
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1936No. File No. 6435PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
Blaintiff sues to recover on a warrant issued by the defendant Burnstad School District. The defendant admits the issuance of the warrant in the sum of $732.03 and that the same has not been paid. It defends on the ground that the warrant is void because issued in payment of the purchase price of certain material used in the construction of a building for the school district, which said material was purchased illegally and without first advertising for bids as required by the statute.
The case was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was ordered for the defendant and the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Brady v. . the Mayor, C., of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Capital Bank v. School District No. 53North Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Gillespie v. Common School District No. 8North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Backhaus v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northwestern Sheet & Iron Works v. County of SiouxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- East Central Water District v. City of Grand Forks, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Twin City Technical LLC v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- East Central Water District v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- St. Paul Foundry Co. v. Burnstad School District No. 31North Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.