People v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, Acting P. J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred by failing to award defendant credit for the number of days he spent in custody following his original sentencing, up to the time of his resentencing. The Attorney General concedes the error. Although we agree the court erred, and that defendant is entitled to additional credit, we believe the appropriate means of remedying an error of this nature is to first move for correction in the trial court. Accordingly, we shall dismiss the appeal.
A jury convicted defendant of attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. ChewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. CulpepperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. WriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. ThornburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002