Legal Opinion

People v. Chew

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1985No. F004630PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, Acting P. J.

When the appellate process has returned a defendant from prison to the trial court on remand for resentencing or for further proceedings which justify a new prison sentence, what statutory credits should the sentencing court compute for the time already spent in prison? We find the time spent in prison between the initial sentencing and resentencing or a new sentence is properly characterized as presentence time. Defendant is entitled to credit for the prison time as if no appeal had been taken. However, we further decide that prison time credits other than those…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. CovinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. In Re WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. AdrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. DueslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. LacebalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API