Legal Opinion
Capriotti v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 14, 1995No. 5:92-cv-01085PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation’s (“Conrail”) renewed motion for summary judgment. On December 18, 1992, this court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Subsequently, on February 15, 1994, Conrail’s motion for summary judgment was denied with leave to renew. The court’s decision on the summary judgment motion was based predominantly on Carlisle v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 990 F.2d 90 (3d Cir.1993), from which, at the time, certiorari…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Raymond D. Robert v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Daniel L. Kulavic, Cross-Appellee v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anne Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Smith v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Walsh v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bailey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Stasior v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.