Legal Opinion

Parsons, Friedmann & Central, Inc. v. Daniels

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 10, 1967No. 6361 and No. 6362; No. 13316 and No. 13781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

These two cases are actions on promissory notes that were tried together m the District Court. The parties are the same in each case.

Typed on the reverse side of each note are the words, “Waiving demand, notice and protest”; then, in the following order were the signatures, “Henry K. Shor” and “Arnold S. Daniels ’ the latter being the appellant in the proceedings before this Division.

As the defendant points out in his brief, the sole issue in these cases is whether from the evidence offered at the trial, there was sufficient evidence for the trial judge to find as. a fact that the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Irving v. BonjornoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Vengrow v. GrimesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. HookerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Lechiara v. AmatoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Black v. HaarMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Superintendent of Bournewood Hospital v. PetersMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Black v. HaarMassachusetts District Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API