Black v. Haar
Massachusetts District Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Cowdrey, P.J.
The plaintiff-tenant instituted this action pursuant to G.L. c. 93A and Chapter 36 of the Acts of 1976, and in tort, to recover damages for rent charged and collected by the defendant lessor in excess of the maximum rent ceiling imposed by the Cambridge Rent Control Board for premises leased by the plaintiff.
It may be inferred from the docket that judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $7,240.00.
The defendant Charles M. Haar claims to be aggrieved on this appeal by: (1) the trial court’s disposition of defendant’s request for ruling number 3; and (2) an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Keeney v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Gentile v. Rent Control Board of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Nayor v. Rent Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Meyer v. HookerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.