Legal Opinion

Kaupp v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 5, 2003No. 02-5636PublishedCited by 368 opinions

1Per curiam

This case turns on the Fourth Amendment rule that a confession “obtained by exploitation of an illegal arrest” may not be used against a criminal defendant. Brown v. Illinois, 422 U. S. 590, 603 (1975). After a 14-year-old girl disappeared in January 1999, the Harris County Sheriff’s Department learned she had had a sexual relationship with her 19-year-old half brother, who had been in the company of petitioner Robert Kaupp, then 17 years old, on the day of the girl’s disappearance. On January 26th, deputy sheriffs questioned the brother and Kaupp at headquarters; Kaupp was cooperative and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by368 opinions

  1. State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Crain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Cortez v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

363 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API