Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Flynt v. Harris

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 14, 2021No. 2:16-cv-02831Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY C. FLYNT; HAIG No. 2:16-cv-02831-JAM-JDP KELEGIAN, SR.; HAIG T. 12 KELEGIAN, JR., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 STEPHANIE K. SHIMAZU, in her official capacity as the 16 Director of the California Department of Justice, Bureau 17 of Gambling Control, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 Larry Flynt, Haig Kelegian, Sr., and Haig Kelegian Jr. 21 (“Plaintiffs”) own cardrooms in California. Plaintiffs want to 22 substantially…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. CottrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. National Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Virgil Deveraturda Bernard Sapitalo Shirley Sampayan Maria Lillibeth Edano v. Globe Aviation Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API