Greene v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J.
John Curtis Greene (defendant) was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Defendant argues (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence discovered as a result of an unlawful seizure, and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In accordance with well established principles, we assess the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction upon a review of the record “in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Wechsler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Bynum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Alvarez v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Freeman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.