Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1996No. 2154951PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, Judge.

Keith Bynum (defendant) was convicted in a bench trial for receiving stolen property in violation of Code § 18.2-108. Defendant complains on appeal (1) that the trial court erroneously declined to suppress evidence resulting from an unlawful search, and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We disagree and affirm the decision.

In accordance with well established principles, we consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction upon a review of the record

in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. GrimsteadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shaver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  2. Jean-Laurent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  3. Glenn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  4. People v. MacKColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API