Legal Opinion
Tire Shop v. Peat
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 21, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mai/tbie, C. J.
On March 30th, 1931, the defendant sold William Carney an automobile truck under a conditional bill of sale which was duly recorded. This provided that title to the car “including all parts, accessories and equipment now or hereafter attached to or used in connection with said car, shall belong to and the title to said car shall be and remain in the seller”; it required the purchaser to maintain the car in good order and repair; and the purchaser agreed “that any added or substituted parts, body or equipment, placed upon the car during the life of this agreement, whether…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holt v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Davis v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. YaworskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. CaesarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Firestone Service Stores, Inc. v. DardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.