Legal Opinion

Vollstedt v. City of Stockton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1990No. C003471PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

Introduction

Appellant William Vollstedt, a permanent employee of respondent City of Stockton (hereafter, the City), was demoted from mechanical maintenance supervisor to mechanic. Following a two-day hearing, the City’s civil service commission (Commission) determined that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the demotion was proper. The Commission forwarded its advisory recommendation to the city manager (City Manager). Without reviewing the evidence presented at the hearing and without the benefit of a written statement of facts prepared by the Commission,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cooper v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. HenslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. El Morro Community Ass'n v. California Department of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. JMS Air Conditioning & Appliance Serv., Inc. v. Santa Monica Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Pinheiro v. Civil Service Commission for the County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API