King King v. Porter

On Appellants’ Second Motion for a Rehearing.

BLAIR, J.

One question raised in this case is, Does this court have -jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, since the amount in controversy is alleged to be less than $100? Heretofore this question was certified to the Supreme Court,-and on June 30, 1923, the question was answered in the affirmative, by an opinion written by Mr; Justice William Pierson. 252 S. W. 1022. The statement of facts submitted to the Supreme Court was as follows:

“Appellee obtained a judgment against J. F. Arnold for a sum in excess of $100. He sued out a garnishment thereon…