Shoemake v. Davis
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, C. J.:
This was an action to enforce an oral contract concerning the acquisition of an oil and gas lease and for an accounting pertaining thereto.
*910Plaintiff, a resident of Wichita, was engaged in securing oil and gas leases and disposing of them for a profit. He had several years’ experience in that business, in the pursuit of which he had become conversant with the development and prospective development of the oil and gas industry in central Kansas and kept tab on the expiration and cancellation of oil and gas leases thereabout.
Defendant, also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shepard v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Wooddell v. AllbrechtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Livingston v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Babcock v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Winemiller v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Wolf v. BrungardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction Company, Burden Ivy Barfield, Bourdon Ray Barfield, and Oliver Eakle Barfield, as Co-Partners Doing Business as Barfield Construction Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Bradbury v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.