Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koffman v. Leichtfuss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2001No. 99-0380Published

1DissentDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 67. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent, for the reasons stated in my dissent in Ellsworth v. Shelbrock, 2000 WI 63, 235 Wis. 2d 678, 611 N.W.2d 76 (Sykes, J., dissenting).

¶ 68. As in Ellsworth, I agree with the majority here that the collateral source rule applies. The main focus of the analysis is the proper measure of damages for past medical expenses in a personal injury case, and also the influence of the law of subrogation.

¶ 69. I conclude, as I did in Ellsworth, that the proper measure of medical damages is the amount reasonably and necessarily incurred for the care and treatment of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ellsworth v. SchelbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Rixmann v. Somerset Public SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API