Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 12, 1932No. 6923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is a second appeal in this case. The former one was from a decree of dismissal after the court had sustained a demurrer to the bill of complaint based upon the ground that the facts alleged did not state a cause of action. Freeman v. Smith, 44 F.(2d) 703, 704. After the case had been remanded to the lower court, the defendant, Smith, treasurer of the territory of Alaska, filed an answer denying the allegation of the bill t,hat the average cátch. of salmon for each year by members of the trolling fleet did not exceed $500 and alleging “that trollers who, during the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Haavik v. Alaska Packers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill. Co. of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Freeman v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Bodkin v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Mullaney, Commissioner of Taxation of Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- P. E. Harris & Co. v. MullaneyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949
- Anderson v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1934
- Anderson v. Mullaney, Commissioner of Taxation of Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951