Legal Opinion
Haavik v. Alaska Packers Assn.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 7, 1924No. 128PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Appellant challenges the validity of the Act of the Alaska Legislature approved May 1, 1919 (c. 29, Session Laws 1919), which imposes upon each male person, with certain exceptions, within the territory or the. waters thereof an annual poll tax of five dollars to be used for school purposes; and also that portion of the Act of the same Legislature approved May 5, 1921 (c. 31, Session Laws 1921), which imposes an annual license tax of five dollars upon every non-resident fisherman — the term “ to include all persons employed on a boat engaged in fishing.”
Congress established an organized .…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dewey v. Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Duehay v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.