Legal Opinion
Price v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 1, 1965No. 41156PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
The court is never required, even as to a fact uncontradicted and undisputed, to instruct the jury that such fact exists. “The better practice is to allow the jury to determine the question whether any issuable fact proved by either party is uncontradicted.” Scott v. Valdosta, Moultrie &c. R. Co., 13 Ga. App. 65 (1) (78 SE 784); New Ware Furniture Co. v. Reynolds, 16 Ga. App. 19 (1a) (84 SE 491); Ballentine Motors of Ga. v. Nimmons, 93 Ga. App. 708, 712 (92 SE2d 714); Limbert v. Bishop, 96 Ga. App. 652, 655 (101 SE2d 148); Drum v. Shirey, 106 Ga. App. 699, 701 (128 SE2d 92). An…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Limbert v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Ballentine Motors of Georgia, Inc. v. NimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- State Highway Department v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- New Ware Furniture Co. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Scott v. Valdosta, Moultrie & Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Highway Department v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Dendy v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Klumok v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Department of Transportation v. EASTERN OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Department of Transportation v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.