Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Whitehurst

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1962No. 39580PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Franicum, Judge.

“Refusal to allow counsel to put a certain question to a witness on direct examination can not be held to be error where it does not appear that the expected answer was disclosed to the trial judge. A different rule applies to questions asked on cross-examination.” Gilpin v. State Highway Board, 39 Ga. App. 238 (1, 2), supra. Special ground 1 of the motion for new trial is without merit.

“In determining just and adequate compensation, under the constitutional provision, market value and actual value will ordinarily be synonymous. If they are not, that value which will give…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAVANNAH v. SAVANNAH &C. WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Harrison v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. State Highway Department v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. State Highway Department v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. State Highway Department v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. City of Gainesville v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Freedman v. Housing Authority of City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Price v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Department of Transportation v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API