Klumok v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The condemnees took this appeal from a judgment of the superior court after jury trial fixing compensation for land taken for a limited access highway.
1. It was not error to admit opinion testimony of several witnesses which would have authorized the jury to conclude that there was present a reasonable possibility or probability of a change in the existing zoning restrictions, which would have an appreciable influence on the market value of the remaining portions of the condemnee’s property. The evidence, although in sharp conflict, authorized the court’s instructions to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- State Highway Board v. BaxterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- State Highway Department v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Civils v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dendy v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Evans v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Lee v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- State Highway Department v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Lee v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.