Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, St. Paul & Chicago Railway Company and Russell Sage, from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Bunn, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate.
Our decision on a former appeal herein taken by the plaintiff is reported in 86 Minn. 509, 91 N. W. 29. We held on that appeal that the conditions upon which the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance imposed by the district court were inequitable, and remanded the case, with directions to the district court so to amend its conclusions of law as to provide, in effect, that the time limited in which the plaintiff must pay or deposit the amount found due to the defendant Sage shall commence to run…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. WagesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Western Realty Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vanzandt v. HeilmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- State Bank of Milan v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- First National Bank v. Corporation Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.