Legal Opinion
Jancyn Manufacturing Corp. v. County of Suffolk
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1987PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Simons, J.
Plaintiff, the manufacturer of a cesspool additive known as "Drainz,” a product which contains chlorinated hydrocarbons, commenced this action seeking a declaration that Suffolk County Local Law No. 12 of 1980 was invalid because it was superseded by ECL article 39. Local Law No. 12 prohibits the sale of cesspool additives, defined to include any organic chemical or compound used for cleaning or unclogging sewer *94lines or sewage disposal systems, without prior approval by the Suffolk County Commissioner of the Department of Health Services (Local Law No. 12 §§ 2,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Town of Red HookNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- New York State Club Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Robin v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Albany Area Builders Ass'n v. Town of GuilderlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kamhi v. Town of YorktownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- DJL Restaurant Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Incorporated Village of Nyack v. Daytop Village, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Frew Run Gravel Products, Inc. v. Town of CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.