Legal Opinion

Davidsen v. Kirkland

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1961No. 53PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

This was an action for damages based upon an alleged assault and battery. The trial court instructed the jury on contributory negligence. The main questions to determine on this appeal are whether contributory negligence was a defense to the action, and if not, whether giving the instruction was reversible error.

One evening Carl Davidsen cashed a $50 check at the Hitchin’ Post, a saloon, in order to pay for drinks. Some time later he went back to that establishment, paid the owner $50 in cash, asked for the return of the check, and was informed that it was in the possession of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hunter v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Shima v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Gleaton v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API