Legal Opinion
McMullen v. Head
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 6, 1945No. 3198Published
1Opinion of the Court
LEDERLE, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. This is an action brought in accordance with the provisions of Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. On June 2, 1936, Frederick E. McMullen (hereinafter referred to as “McMullen”) filed an application for United States Letters Patent, Serial No. 83,118, for a method of cutting gears and a device for practicing the method disclosed. This application was assigned to plaintiff Gleason Works, a New York corporation. Ernest C. Head (hereinafter referred to as “Head”) filed an application for United States Letters…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bayer v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Schmertz Wire-Glass Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate-Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1909
- Colman v. HathawayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922
- Schmertz Wire Glass Co. v. Western Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1938