Raymond v. Hattrick
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered December 22, 1917, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Appellants brought suit in King county to compel specific performance of an oral gift of real estate. To the second amended complaint, a demurrer was interposed, which being sustained, appellants elected to stand upon their complaint and judgment of dismissal was entered against them, from which they appeal.
The second amended complaint alleges, in substance, that appellants are husband and wife, and that the respondents are the parents of the appellant wife; that in March, 1912, the respondents were the owners of *620lot 9, block 82, in Gilman’s addition to tbe city of Seattle, and also owned and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Barrett v. SchleichOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Wainwright v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Hotchkin v. McNaught-Collins Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Burris v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slavin v. AckmanWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Marshall v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- Young v. ReedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978