Legal Opinion

Hotchkin v. McNaught-Collins Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1918No. 14262PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court- for King county, Albertson, J., entered October 5, 1916, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for equitable relief.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this case appellant, in his brief, makes a comprehensive statement that the action is brought by him as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, in whose lifetime the action, substantially as here presented, was before this court three times; and in the case as now presented the appellant has, in his complaint, attempted to avoid the errors upon which the decisions were rendered against the appellant in the several cases referred to, Collins v. Kinnear, 37 Wash. 453, 79 Pac. 995; Hotchkin v. Bussell, 46 Wash. 7, 89 Pac. 183, and Hotchkin v. McNaught-Collins Imp. Co., 67 Wash. 206,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Munson v. HallowellTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Depue v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Newberger v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. German v. HeathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Arneman v. ArnemanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gillespie v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Bechler v. KayeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Auve v. WenzlaffWashington Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API