Legal Opinion

State v. Futrall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. 2008-2391PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether a trial court is precluded from sealing an applicant’s convictions that are eligible to be sealed by statute when one of the convictions is exempt from being sealed. Because we hold that a conviction that is exempt by statute from being sealed also precludes the sealing of convictions that are otherwise eligible, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Facts

{¶ 2} In May 2001, defendant-appellant, Douglas Futrall, was indicted on five criminal offenses: (1) aggravated menacing in violation of R.C. 2903.21(A), a first-degree misdemeanor, (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. McGrath v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Aguirre (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. The State Ex Rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. Radcliff (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API