Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 2005No. Nos. 2004-0448 and 2004-1765PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} These are mandamus cases in which relators request copies of police officer photographs. Because these records are peace-officer residential and familial information under R.C. 149.43(A)(7)(b) and exempt from disclosure under R.C. 149.43(A)(l)(p), we deny the writ.
State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland, Case No. 2004-0448
{¶ 2} Relator, Plain Dealer Publishing Company (“Plain Dealer”), publishes the Plain Dealer newspaper, which is circulated to the general public throughout the greater metropolitan area of respondent, the city of Cleveland, Ohio.
{¶ 3} Under General…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carr v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Oriana House, Inc. v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Repository v. Nova Behavioral Health, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Mahajan v. State Med. Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Law Office of Montgomery County Public Defender v. RosencransOhio Supreme Court · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.