Grant v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in a suit for partition. The point made by the appellants is that the decree does not determine the interest of all the various parties in the premises, and that for this reason it is invalid and should be reversed.
The facts found by the court, and admitted by the parties, which are necessary to be noticed, are these: The premises consist of a city lot in San Francisco, upon which there is a large business building; and it is found by the court, and admitted, that it cannot be divided, but must be sold. On the third day of June, 1885, the owners…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- De Uprey v. De UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Stevens v. McCormickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
- Lorenz v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Bollo v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hazen v. WebbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Hughes Brothers v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Honsinger v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.