Legal Opinion

Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1960No. 488-56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, a national banking association with a place of business in Dallas, Texas, brings this action as an assignee of moneys allegedly due under a supply contract between Minera Fernandez, S.A., of Parral, Chihuahua, Mexico, and the United States. The plaintiff seeks in the action to recover moneys withheld and applied by the United States to recoup the amounts of alleged overpay-ments theretofore made by the United States under the contract.

The contract involved in the litigation was entered into as of October 20, 1951. The contracting officer who signed the contract on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Waxman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. United States v. HaddenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Truong Xuan Truc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Triton Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Sigmon Fuel Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  5. Unity Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API