Legal Opinion
MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 2017No. 113,752PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
’Colbert, J.
¶ 1 This appeal was retained to reiterate the proper application of this Court’s decision in Summers v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2009 OK 33, 213 P.3d 565, to monetary awards—although paid—not provided as ordered. Today, this Court reemphasizes that an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) that clearly identifies previously ordered benefits and finds that insurer failed to demonstrate good cause for its delay in, or noncompliance with, providing court ordered benefits satisfies the certification requirements delineated in Summers. Because the certification requirements were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Goodwin v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Drake v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.