Cunningham v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Four grounds for reversal are' urged by appellant,' who was convicted in the Municipal Court after a' trial without a jury, of soliciting prostitution. Code, 1940, Supp, VII, 22-2701.
1. Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the conviction. This makes it necessary to recite some of the more important parts of the testimony. Two police officers were in a privately owned automobile after midnight on the date of the alleged offense. From the automobile they had a conversation with a man named Glover. 1 Glover offered to procure a woman for them for purposes of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Schnoor Ex Rel. Schnoor v. MeineckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. DorathySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BolandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- Slaughter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hackett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952