Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1952No. 1182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Four grounds for reversal are' urged by appellant,' who was convicted in the Municipal Court after a' trial without a jury, of soliciting prostitution. Code, 1940, Supp, VII, 22-2701.

1. Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the conviction. This makes it necessary to recite some of the more important parts of the testimony. Two police officers were in a privately owned automobile after midnight on the date of the alleged offense. From the automobile they had a conversation with a man named Glover. 1 Glover offered to procure a woman for them for purposes of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Schnoor Ex Rel. Schnoor v. MeineckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. DorathySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BolandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. Slaughter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Hackett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API