State v. Dorathy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
The respondent was tried and convicted, on an indictment under Sec. 6 of Chapter 135, R. S., for taking indecent liberties with a female person under the age of sixteen years.
During the trial, the prosecutrix, in cross-examination, was asked whether, at about the time when respondent is charged with having committed the offense set out in the indictment, she did something naughty with a boy of the village; and whether she had told her mother anything about him. On objection the court excluded these questions, and exception was noted.
The record then shows the following:
• Q. “Do you know a boy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Commonwealth v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Black v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- People v. ElcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Commonwealth v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Torres v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BobbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- State v. RangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- State v. RangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.