Legal Opinion

State v. Dorathy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 13, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The respondent was tried and convicted, on an indictment under Sec. 6 of Chapter 135, R. S., for taking indecent liberties with a female person under the age of sixteen years.

During the trial, the prosecutrix, in cross-examination, was asked whether, at about the time when respondent is charged with having committed the offense set out in the indictment, she did something naughty with a boy of the village; and whether she had told her mother anything about him. On objection the court excluded these questions, and exception was noted.

The record then shows the following:

• Q. “Do you know a boy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Black v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. People v. ElcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Commonwealth v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  2. Torres v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. BobbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  4. State v. RangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. State v. RangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API