Legal Opinion

Donner v. Ogilvie

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county; George P. Andrews, Justice. Action by Esther Donner, an infant, by next friend, against Clinton Ogilvie and Ida M. Ingersoll, individually and as executor and executrix of William H. Ogilvie, deceased, Benjamin E. Hahn, and Henry Schumacher, for injuries received from a fall from a platform on defendants’ premises. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

The contents of the amended complaint in this action may be summarized as follows: The defendants Ogilvie and Ingersoll owned and controlled the premises 94 Sheriff street, in the city of Hew York, which consisted of a rear tenement house occupied by a number of tenants. Prior to April 22, 1887, they leased these premises to the defendants Hahn and Schumacher for a term of years. While the premises were in the possession of the defendants, (no particular defendants being specified,) certain rooms therein *634were let and rented to the plaintiff’s father from, month to month at an agreed rent,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Matthews v. . TuftsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Bold v. O'BrienNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mallach v. RidleyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fisher v. RankinNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Franz v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Reissman v. JacobowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
  5. Donner v. OgilvieNew York Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API