Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Rankin

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Re-argument of an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The appeal in this action has already been ■heard and decided by this general term, but upon an application made by the defendant a re-argument has been ordered. This direction for the re-hearing of the appeal proceeded to some extent upon the ease of Wasson v. Pettit, 49 Hun, 166. The appeal has been again argued pursuant to this direction, and the point taken in support of it has now been made mainly dependent upon the construction to be placed upon the complaint in the action.

*192It was for a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff in. falling upon the sidewalk on Forty-eighth street in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Congreve v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polhemus v. PolhemusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Orvis v. Elmira, Cortland & Northern RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Dood v. RothschildAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
  4. Bartlett v. BunnNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API