Cinmark Investment Co. v. Reichard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
In 1958, appellant Cinmark Investment Company entered into an agreement leasing with option to purchase, for an 11-year term, approximately 15 acres of unimproved farming land owned by respondents Donald and Alta Reiehard. Thereafter, a portion of the property subject to the lease and option agreement, about 4 percent or .6 acres, was condemned for highway purposes by the city. Appellant and respondents were both named as party defendants in the condemnation proceedings. An award of $12,489 was subsequently made. Appellant, by a cross-complaint in the same proceedings, instituted this action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cullen & Vaughn Co. v. Bender Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rogers v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Grunauer v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Wilcox v. Wyandotte World-Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972