Legal Opinion

Cinmark Investment Co. v. Reichard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1966No. Civ. 29033PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

In 1958, appellant Cinmark Investment Company entered into an agreement leasing with option to purchase, for an 11-year term, approximately 15 acres of unimproved farming land owned by respondents Donald and Alta Reiehard. Thereafter, a portion of the property subject to the lease and option agreement, about 4 percent or .6 acres, was condemned for highway purposes by the city. Appellant and respondents were both named as party defendants in the condemnation proceedings. An award of $12,489 was subsequently made. Appellant, by a cross-complaint in the same proceedings, instituted this action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cullen & Vaughn Co. v. Bender Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rogers v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Grunauer v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Wilcox v. Wyandotte World-Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API