Jelsma v. Colonial Penn Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
This is a companion case to Jelsma v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 231 Neb. 657, 437 N.W.2d 778 (1989). Except as otherwise declared herein, the facts are substantially the same in each case. Colonial Penn Insurance Co. has appealed from a judgment of the district court which declared that the attempted cancellation of the insurance policy which it had issued to H.L. and Tommy Jelsma was not effective and that the policy was in effect on July 29, 1986, the date of the Jelsmas’ loss. We affirm.
The errors assigned by Colonial Penn were substantially as follows: The trial court erred in (1) holding that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. MuthNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Jelsma v. Scottsdale InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Workman v. Great Plains Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. SeldersNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Sanks v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lone Cedar Ranches, Inc. v. JandebeurNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Waite v. AS Battiato Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Stoural v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stoural v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
- Waite v. AS Battiato Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991