Legal Opinion
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Muth
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1973No. 38783PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.
This action is one for a declaratory judgment between the insurer, the insured, and the judgment creditor of the insured. It presents the question of the construction of an exclusion in a policy of liability insurance and the applicability of the exclusion to the facts as found by the trial court.
The language of the exclusion is as follows: “This policy does not apply ... to bodily injury or property damage which is either expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured.” The pertinent insuring clause in the homeowner’s policy involved in this case is as follows: “. . . to pay on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Ruby WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Scott Rankin v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co., Mansfield v. Blackburn Ex Rel. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- James Graham Brown Foundation, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. GamacheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. PhalenMontana Supreme Court · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.