Legal Opinion

Wright v. Mullen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1983No. WD 33487PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The plaintiffs Wright and Constantine sued the defendants Mullen to recover for the malicious prosecution against them of a civil action. The trial court employed the principle of collateral estoppel to enter a partial summary judgment against the defendants on the issue of liability and to order a trial on the issue of damages only. A jury returned a verdict of $10,000 actual and $20,000 punitive damages for each plaintiff. The appeal contends that the summary judgment order that the malicious prosecution cause of action, save for damages, was concluded against the defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. McCoy v. BriegelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brunner v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Phillips v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Hussmann Corp. v. UQM Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Henningsen v. Independent Petrochemical Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. J.C. Jones & Co. v. DoughtyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API