Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Beasley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1985No. 302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Is an order denying a petition to bifurcate economic claims from a cause of action for divorce an appealable order? We conclude that it is neither final nor appealable; and, therefore, we quash the appeal taken from such an order.

Helen M. Beasley commenced an action in divorce against her husband, James E. Beasley, on October 29, 1981. She alleged that the marriage was irretrievably broken and suggested that she would file an affidavit of consent after ninety days. Numerous ancillary petitions were thereafter filed and argued before the trial court. Decisions thereof were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In Re Tameka M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In re T.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API