Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

After a joint trial, defendants were convicted of the crimes of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law, § 404) and possession of burglars’ instruments after prior conviction (Penal Law, § 408). We are satisfied that the evidence amply supports the jury’s finding that defendants were guilty of the crimes charged, and that the curtailment by the trial court of the line of inquiry pursued by defense counsel on cross-examination of the medical student, Bernard Shagan, was not prejudical error.

We turn now to defendants’ claim that error was committed by the trial court in permitting a stipulation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. People v. . MarendiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Johnson v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. People v. De SantisNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  2. State v. EdingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States ex rel. Jenkins v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. EdingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API