People v. De Santis
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
We are all satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the verdict was not inconsistent.
It was not reversible error to include in the indictment allegations charging defendant as a prior offender, and to receive proof therof at the trial. This has long been the settled practice in this State (Johnson v. People, 55 N. Y. 512; People v. Sickles, 156 N. Y. 541; People v. Gowasky, 244 N. Y. 451), and countless convictions were based on such indictments. The Legislature has not prohibited this practice by its enactment in 1926 of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GowaskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- People v. ReeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of Dodd v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Johnson v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. SpillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. KoponenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. Hunter, New York County Courts1956
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.