Commonwealth v. Mahnke
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals from convictions on indictments charging larceny of a motor vehicle (see G. L. c. 266, § 28, as amended through St. 1972, c. 78) and possession of burglarious implements (see G. L. c. 266, § 49). He assigns as error the denial of his motion for required findings of not guilty on those indictments.
We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth (Commonwealth v. Sandler, 368 Mass. 729, 740 [1975]) in order to determine whether it, along with permissible inferences which could be drawn therefrom, was sufficient to satisfy a rational trier of fact of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Costarelli v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. SubiloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. CabotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Ronald CzajakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Commonwealth v. McMasterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DreyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. AleoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. CoyleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.