Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dreyer

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 21, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Dreyer appeals from the convictions upon various complaints. We reverse the convictions on grounds outlined below.

1. Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon.

Dreyer contends that the judge’s instructions on assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon improperly did not require the jury to find that he intended to use a screwdriver as a dangerous weapon.1 In Commonwealth v. Appleby, 380 Mass. 296, 307 (1980), the court stated that G. L. c. 265, § 15A, “does not require specific intent to injure . . . only general intent to do the act causing the injury” and (at 308) that,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. GrazianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. ApplebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. SubiloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. DykensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. GarofaloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API