Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coyle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 20, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants were convicted on indictments charging them with *983assault and battery (G. L. c. 265, § 13A) and unarmed robbery (G. L. c. 265, § 19[b]). The convictions of assault and battery were placed on file with the defendants’ consent. The principal issue raised on appeal concerns the denial of the defendants’ motions for required findings of not guilty on the robbery indictments.

The Commonwealth based its case on a joint enterprise theory. Under such a theory, the Commonwealth is required to “show that the defendant ‘intentionally assisted the principal in the commission of the crime and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. United States v. Ronald CzajakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BucksonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API