Legal Opinion
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. Lindsay
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 31, 1983No. 21984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is taken from a judgment of the circuit court, which affirmed the imposition of additional assessments against appellant Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company for excessive utilization of the South Carolina Reinsurance Facility. We affirm and, with certain deletions adopt the judgment of the trial court.
The South Carolina Reinsurance Facility (“the Facility”) was established as part of the Automobile Reparation Reform Act of 1974, Act 1177, now appearing as Sections 38-37-710 through 38-37-790, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. In essence the Facility exists to achieve a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- South Carolina Department of Revenue & Taxation v. Rosemary Coin MacHines, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Garris v. GOV. BD. OF SC REINSURANCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998