Legal Opinion

South Carolina Department of Revenue & Taxation v. Rosemary Coin MacHines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1998No. 2840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge:

Rosemary Coin Machines, Inc. (Rosemary Coin) .brought this action to appeal the assessment of license fees it claims were retroactively charged by the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation (Revenue) for a multi-player video poker machine. Revenue cited Rosemary for having only a single license for a multi-player machine after the video poker licensing statute was amended during the period of the machine’s original license to require a separate license for each station. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decided Revenue’s application of an amendment to the licensing…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Richland County School District Two v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. South Carolina Department of Revenue v. Rosemary Coin MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API