Legal Opinion
McKinney v. First National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1893No. 4617PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This was an action brought by plaintiffs in error to recover the possession of certain goods, wares, and merchandise. The plaintiffs in their amended petition allege:
“First — That the plaintiffs are the owners and are entitled to the immediate possession of the following goods and chattels, to-wit: * * *
“ Second — That defendant First National Bank of Chadron, Nebraska, is a banking association duly organized and incorporated under the laws of the United States, and doing business at Chadron, Nebraska. That the defendant the First National Bank of Chadron, Nebraska, wrongfully detains said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haggard v. WallenNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Tootle v. First Natl. BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Bank v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Field v. S. P. Morse & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- John V. Farwell & Co. v. KlomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.